Case study :Chad- Cameroon Pipeline Project. Assist with Question 2

08:33 & al LTE @ ' 2024_PMG 4812_Managi... v Done Team Assignment 2 Case Study: Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project Due Date: 30 April 2024 Init in this a. nm SU3 - Internal Stakeholder (Project Team) Development SU4 - Managing Project Team Performance 2024 PGM4812 Module Overview: Managing Project Stakeholders 3. SUS5-Managing Difficult Stakeholders Question 1 Assume that you have been appointed as the project manager for this project and have been given the responsibility to put together (acquire) a core project team. Identify the core team positions and the criteria that you would use to select each one for the project. (40 marks) Question 2 Explain how you would develop a cohesive project team during the formation stage of the project. Keep in mind that it is highly likely that it will be a multi-cultural project team. (30 marks) Question 2 The case study has highlighted the conflict between the community stakeholders and the government. Assume that you are the World Bank representative appointed to this project. Explain what techniques you would use to try and resolve the conflict. (30 marks) Technical requirements: Maximum length is 10 pages (excluding the cover page, table of contents, and references); references and citation of journal articles, books, efc., is mandatory using the Harvard Referencing Method. VERY IMPORTANT: Assignments must be submitted by the due date. A student who is unable to submit by the due date may apply for an extension from the academic director before the actual due date. Only reasons such as illness or the death of a family member will be considered. Acceptable evidence of the circumstances, such as medical certificates, must be submitted with the request. Extensions will not be granted for not meeting the due date due to work commitments. Your request must clearly indicate your name, your student number, the programme for which you are registered, the module, the lecturer, the assignment number, reasons, and evidence for the request and must be forwarded, in writing, to the program coordinator. It is of vital importance that you tie your answers to your analysis and do not merely present information. Your answers to the above will be assessed in terms of the direction, degree, depth, scope, and strength of analysis displayed, the manner in which information is presented and argued, inferences are drawn, literature is integrated to defend or contradict and the logical manner in which decisions are reached after critical assessing and discussions. An answer which is narrowly focussed on reiterating what happened or just stating decisions without showing why the facts were considered important or why this decision is better than others, will not be awarded good marks. By the due date, you should be able to make your submission based on the tasks articulated above. .. Follow the instructions. allow enouah time to think and reflget. ... (1