Case Study-EMPLOYMENT LAW

Shane owns a business called "Vic Tours" (VT) located in Lorne. He owns a 5 Busses used to provide Bus Tours for International Tourists - around Victoria.

Because Shane's business was expanding, he approached his Bank for a loan to buy one another Bus. However, he had insufficient asset security, he was refused the loan.Therefore, Shane asked his friend Michael, to come and work for him. Michael is a Bus driver, who also owns his own Bus.

for the past two years Michael has been working at Shane's business "Vic Tours"

A few weeks ago, while driving his bus for one of the 'Vic Tours' jobs, Michael failed to indicate that he was changing lanes - and - crashed into a car in the adjoining lane.

As a result Jemal the driver and owner of the other car - a Taxicab - was severely injured and suffered extensive damages to his car. He was taken to hospital where he received medical treatment for a broken arm and a broken leg.

Jemal saw the sign on the side of the bus displayed the words "Vic Tours". Jemal has now, after his long stay in hospital, has decided to sue Shane as the owner of "Vic Tours".

Jemal as the owner of the Taxi wants to claim the following damages-

a.$6,000 for 'Medical Costs'; and

b.$5,000 for 'Motor Repair Costs'; and

c.$8,000 for'Loss of Profits'; and

d.$4,000 for 'Loss of Deposit'for 'Hotel Accommodation Booking'. He was just about to go on a Holiday- when the accident happened. He was forced to cancel the holiday and lost his deposit on the accommodation.

Jemal has written to Shane requesting compensation for his losses. Shane absolutely refuses to pay anything.

He says that Michael is not his Employee but is an Independent Contractor, who should pay for his own negligent conduct.

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

The circumstances of Shane and Michael's Work Relationship are as follows-

1.Shane and Michael have signed a 'Written Contract' stating that Michael is engaged as an 'Independent Contractor'.

2.Michael being the Owner of his Coach, pays for his own maintenance and repairs.

3.Shane pays for the regular internal cleaning, and external washing, of the Coach.

4.Shane has placed his brand name "VIC TOURS' - on both sides of the Coach. This allows him to advertise and market his business extensively.

5.Shane gives directions and instructions to Michael as to the details of the particular Bus including the times and the places for collection and delivery of passengers and the destination.

6.Michael also accepts 'Coach driving work, from time to time, with other Bus Tour companies.

7.Shane pays to Michael $2,000 weekly Salary. He deducts "Pay as you go Tax"(PAYG Tax) and pays the balance of $1,700 into Michael's Bank account.

8.Shane pays Superannuation Contributions to Michael's Superannuation Fund.

9.Michael is allowed to delegate the 'driving work' to another qualified driver - if he's unable to drive due to illness or being busy elsewhere.

10.Michael owns a separate business selling memorabilia to Tourists. These items include little stuffed toys such as kangaroos and koalas. Shane allows him Michael to sell the toys on the Bus Tours in return for a

commission on the sales.

11.Shane pays for the 'Motor Vehicle Insurance' of Michael's Bus.

Question:

Explainthe 'Multi Factor Test' used to determine the nature of a work relationship - with reference to the High Court Case 'Hollis v VabuPty Ltd (2001).Please mention references