Case Study: RobberyBackground:Sarah, a 30-year-old Canadian citizen residing in Vancouver, has been struggling with financialdifficulties after losing her job during the COVID-19 pandemic. Feeling desperate, Sarah decidesto rob a convenience store at knifepoint in order to obtain money to pay her bills and support herfamily.Legal Proceedings:Sarah is apprehended by the police shortly after the robbery and charged with armed robbery, aserious criminal offense under the Canadian Criminal Code. She is taken into custody andbrought before the court for her initial appearance. At the hearing, Sarah is informed of thecharges against her and advised of her rights.Court Proceedings:Sarah decides to plead guilty to the charge of armed robbery. The court schedules a sentencinghearing to determine the appropriate punishment for her actions. During the hearing, both theprosecution and the defense present their arguments and evidence to the judge.Prosecution's Argument:The prosecution argues that Sarah's actions were premeditated and calculated, as evidenced byher use of a weapon to threaten the store clerk. They emphasize the serious nature of armedrobbery and the impact it has on victims and communities. The prosecution requests a substantialsentence to reflect the gravity of the offense and to deter others from committing similar crimes.Defense's Argument:The defense acknowledges Sarah's wrongdoing but argues that her actions were driven bydesperation and financial hardship rather than malicious intent. They highlight Sarah's remorsefor her actions and her willingness to cooperate with the authorities. The defense requests a morelenient sentence, taking into account Sarah's difficult circumstances and her potential forrehabilitation.Sentencing Decision:After considering all the arguments and evidence presented, the judge deliberates on theappropriate sentence for Sarah. The judge takes into account the severity of the offense, Sarah'sremorse, her lack of prior criminal record, and her potential for rehabilitation. Ultimately, thejudge imposes a sentence of 5 years in prison, with eligibility for parole after serving two-thirdsof the sentence, along with a requirement for Sarah to participate in a rehabilitation programduring her incarceration.

Questions:1. What factors influenced Sarah's decision to commit armed robbery?

2. How did the prosecution argue for a substantial sentence in Sarah's case?

3. What mitigating factors did the defense present in Sarah's defense?

4. What considerations did the judge take into account when determining Sarah's sentence?

5. How might Sarah's sentence impact her ability to reintegrate into society after serving herprison term?

6. What steps could be taken to prevent individuals like Sarah from resorting to crime due tofinancial hardship in the futu