Case : Yvonne Wsposito and Louis Espacito, Plaintiffs$-$appellees, v$.$Jason C$.$ davis and Mks Productions, Inc. Defendants appellants, $47$ F$.3$d $164(5$th Cir. $1995)$

Question: The court did not agree with Davis that he had no duty to act. Indeed, the court held that the product of the likelihood of Esposito's injury exceeded Davis' burden of the precautions. Thus, the risk to Esposito was unreasonable and Davis' failure to take precautions was negligence.Explain how Davis' conduct $($facts$)$ fell below the following standard or test: What was the likelihood that Davis' conduct would injure others?What is the level of seriousness of the injury if it happens?What is Davis' cost of the precaution he must take to avoid the risk?