Caz McChrystal World Industries, Inc. (CMWI), A Wisconsin corporation headquartered in Milwaukee, negotiates and enters into a contract with Public Image, Ltd. (PiL), a California company headquartered in Los Angeles and incorporated under the laws of Delaware. Under the terms of the contract, PiL will provide ongoing support services to CMWI in order to increase traffic to its site, increase CMWI's social media impact, and protect CMWI's reputation online. To complete the work, CMWI and PiL regularly sent coding, apps, and plug ins back and forth between Milwaukee and LA. Over the course of two years, CMWI was generally pleased with PiL's work. PiL sent quarterly invoices to CMWI, which CMWI promptly paid. The payments made by CMWI to PiL were drawn from a Wisconsin bank. However, in the third year of the contract, PiL became not only sloppy, but began to actively work against CMWI. It seems PiL was no longer happy with the payments it was receiving from CMWI. The payments made by CMWI were fully in accordance with the terms of the contract, but PiL began to demand higher payments than the contract required. When CMWI referred PiL to the agreed upon payment terms and stated that it would not pay more than the parties had agreed, PiL began placing fraudulent negative reviews of CMWI on various social media and review sites. CMWI filed suit against PiL in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court. PiL filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. What is the court most likely to rule and why?