cenario I :enario I is based on fabricated data inspired by the following study: 'arner, C. B. 8.: Jackson, J. D. (2009). A time course examination of the review effect: older adults need a longer preview than younger adults. hjoermienrafgjhg Research. 35 , 32?? 47'. review Time and Aging he purpose of this experiment was to determine the minimum preview 1 aquired for adults to make a fast perceptual decision. Young adults and l iults were presented visual stimuli for 357', 414, 471, 529 or 585 .illiseconds l(ms). Knowing that older adults are more sensitive to cool :mperatures, the researchers increased the temperature of the room to egrees for the older adults {the temperature of the room for younger ad as 68 degree 5} at the request of the IRB. The visual stimulus was prese .1 a computer monitor and contained several letter Ls rotated at various egrees. After the preview stimulus the participants were shown the tee ;imulus. This contained the Ls in the preview, as well as several additio: s and one letter T. The participants were instructed to locate the 1% '? aJ 'ere given 5.5 seconds to do so. This procedure was repeated several ti lCl'l that each participant received 360 trials. The results indicated that aunger adults located the T more quickly than the older adults regardle review time. Among the younger adults, preview time significantly affe: Leir ability to locate the T. Specifically, they were more quickly able to .entify the T when the preview time was 414 ms or 586 ms. The results .dicate that preview time significantly affects perceptual discrimination 'e illustrated in Figure 1. Effect of Preview Time on Response Speed '10 '5' E 40 9 g 3-0 I )0 E \"' I I g I] 35? and \"I 529 53'] Pm U'lle' Tirm igure 1. Participants responded significantly faster to visual stimuli whe Ley were given 529 ms or 589 ms to preview the stimuli