Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

chapter 12 Critical Legal Thinking Case 12.1 Nonconforming Goods The Jacob Hartz Seed Company, Inc. (Hartz), bought soybeans for use as seed from E. R.

chapter 12

Critical Legal Thinking Case

12.1 Nonconforming Goods The Jacob Hartz Seed Company, Inc. (Hartz), bought soybeans for use as seed from E. R. Coleman. Coleman certified that the seed had an 80 percent germination rate. Hartz paid for the beans and picked them up from a warehouse in Card, Arkansas. After the seed was transported to Georgia, a sample was submitted for testing to the Georgia Department of Agriculture. When the department reported a germination level of only 67 percent, Coleman requested that the seed be retested. The second set of tests reported a germination rate of 65 percent. Hartz canceled the contract after the second test, and Coleman reclaimed the seed. Hartz sought a refund of the money it had paid for the seed, claiming the soybeans were nonconforming goods. Who wins? Jacob Hartz Seed Co. v. Coleman, 612 S.W.2d 91 (Ark. 1981).

Schlageter III, John J.; Cheeseman, Henry R.; Reed, Kathleen. Contract Law for Paralegals (p. 330). Pearson Education. Kindle Edition.

Critical Legal Thinking Case

12.3 Revocation of Acceptance Roy E. Farrar Produce Company (Farrar) was a packer and shipper of tomatoes in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. Farrar contacted Wilson, an agent and salesman for International Paper Company (International), and ordered 21,500 tomato boxes for $.64 per box. The boxes were to each hold between 20 and 30 pounds of tomatoes for shipping. When the boxes arrived at Farrar's plant, 3,624 of them were immediately used to pack tomatoes. When the boxes were stacked, they began to collapse and crush the tomatoes contained within them. The produce company was forced to repackage the tomatoes and store the unused tomato boxes. Farrar contacted International and informed it that it no longer wanted the boxes because they could not perform as promised. International claimed that Farrar had accepted the packages and must pay for them. Who wins? International Paper Co. v. Farrar, 700 P.2d 642 (N.M. 1985).

Schlageter III, John J.; Cheeseman, Henry R.; Reed, Kathleen. Contract Law for Paralegals (p. 330). Pearson Education. Kindle Edition.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Quantitative Chemical Analysis

Authors: Daniel C. Harris

8th edition

1429218150, 978-1429218153

Students also viewed these Law questions