Charise owns a portable hot dog stand that she takes to an amusement park. One day the stand rolled down a hill injurying Carolyn. What standard of care will be used to determine whether Charise is liable in neglifgence for the injuries caused to Carolyn? A. Whether Charise acted maliciously. B. Whether Charise acted intentionally. C. Whether the evidence proves Charise's liability beyond a reasonable doubt. D. Whether Charise exercised reasonable care in securing the stand. --- Gary was drinking at a bar and became visibly intoxicated. The bar continued to serve him. While still at the bar, Gary started fighting with Juan who was another customer at the bar. In the fight Gary caused Juan a black eye and other facial injuries. Will the bar be liable to Juan? A. Yes, based on Dram Shop laws. B. Yes based on the doctrine of attractive nuisance. C. Yes, based on respondeat superior. D. No, Juan was the wrongdoer, not the bar. --- Zack is selling his car to Tanisha. She was uncertain about buying the vehicle. To help promote the sale, Zack told Tanisha the brakes were brand new. In fact, the brakes were quite old and worn. Tanisha bought the car relying on Zack's statement. What tort has Zack committed? A. Malicious prosecution. B. Intentional infliction of emotional distress. C. Fraud. D. Invasion of privacy. --- Which of the following is the test to determine whether trademark infringement has occurred? A. Whether the statements made are true or not. B. Whether the allegedly infringing name is likely to confuse customers. C. Whether the alleged infringer used a technological advancement created by someone else. D. Whether the plaintiff can prove infringement beyond a reasonable doubt. --- Which of the following is not an element of all torts? A. Wrongful conduct B. Proximate cause C. Intentional conduct. D. Injury.