Charles wants to buy a pre owned Harley davidson motorcycle and drops by several motorcycle dealerships before choosing to buy a good quality pre owned , soft tail model from Kenny's motorcycle dealership. Kenny tells Charles that the motorcycle was manufactured in 2008 and had only done 12,000 kilometres. After using the motorcycle for four months Charles had it serviced at an authorised Harley Davidson repair centre. He was told by the repairman the the motorcycle was in a good condition, considering that it was mad in 2004. The repairman did admit that he was surprised that it had done only 12,000 kilometres because it was clear that the motorcycle had traveled way more than that. Charles investigates further and find out that the motorcycle was really made in 2004 and he paid about $4000 more than what the motorcycle was really worth on the market. Charles wants to get a remedy against Pete's motorcycle dealership. Explain him his rights under contract law. ( do not answer this question based on Australian consumer law)