Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Cheque no 742 in the amount of RM491 had been entered in the cash journal as RM419 and check no 747 in the amount
Cheque no 742 in the amount of RM491 had been entered in the cash journal as RM419 and check no 747 in the amount of RM58.20 had been entered as RM582. Both checks had been issued to pay for purchases of equipment. vii. REQUIRED: RPERnars a bank resonciliation statement dated 30 June 2017, proceeding to a correct cash balance. 1OPROTZAT The cash account of Sinar Mentari Bhd showed a ledger balance of RM3,969.85 on 30 June 2017. The bank statement as of that date showed a balance of RM4,150.00. Upon comparing the statement with cash records, the following facts were determined. i. There was bank service charge for June of RM25. A bank memo stated that Excellent Bhd's note for RM1,200 and interest of RM36 had been collected on 29 June 2017 and the bank had made a charge of RM5.50 on the collection. (No entry had been made on Sinar Mentari Bhd's books when Excellent Bhd's note was sent to the bank for collection). ii. iii. Receipts for 30 June 2017 for RM3,390 were not deposited until 2 July 2017. iv. Cheques outstanding on 30 June 2017 totalled RM2,136.05. The cheque amounting to RM253.20 on 29 June 2017 that was deposited ing the Sinar Mentari Bhd's account was declined by the bank as it was found non-sufficient fund (NSF) cheque. V. A customer's cheque for RM90 had been entered as RM60 in the cash recep journal by Sinar Mentari Bhd on 15 June 2017. vi. REDMI NOTE 1O PRO I ZAI 25/11/2021"
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.35 Rating (158 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started