Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly-owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are

Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly-owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 17% and British tax rates are 34%.

The markup was 15% and the sales volume was 1000 units. Chinglish calculates its profit per container as follows (all values in British pounds) Corporate management of Torrington Edge wishes to reposition profit in Hong Kong. It is, however, facing two constraints. First, the final sales price in Great Britain must be 20,000 or less to remain competitive. Secondly, the British tax authorities in working with Torrington Edge's cost accounting staff has established a maximum transfer price allowed (from Hong Kong) of 17,800.

Not to leave any potential tax repositioning opportunities unexplored, Torrington Edge wants to combine the components described above with a redistribution of overhead costs. If overhead costs could be reallocated between the two units, but still total 5,000 per unit, and maintain a minimum of 1,750 per unit in Hong Kong, prove that the optimal combination of markups is a 35.0% markup at Chinglish and a 4.64% markup in Torrington Edge. What is the impact of this repositioning on consolidated after-tax profits and total tax payments?

Calculate the profits of Chinglish Dirk and Torrington Edge, and the consolidated results of both, if the markup at Chinglish was increased to 35.0% and the markup at Torrington was reduced to 4.64% in the following table:

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

Homework: Chapter 15 Homework Week 12 Save Score: 0 of 1 pt 7 of 7 (4 complete) HW Score: 56.55%, 3.96 of 7 pts Question Help Problem 15-7 (algorithmic) Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 17% and British tax rates are 34%. The markup was 15% and the sales volume was 1,000 units. Chinglish calculates its profit per container as follows (all values in British pounds): Corporate management of Torrington Edge wishes to reposition profit in Hong Kong. It is, however, facing two constraints. First, the final sales price in Great Britain must be 20,000 or less to remain competitive. Secondly, the British tax authorities in working with Torrington Edge's cost accounting staff-has established a maximum transfer price allowed (from Hong Kong) of 17,800. Not to leave any potential tax repositioning opportunities unexplored, Torrington Edge wants to combine the components described above with a redistribution of overhead costs. If overhead costs could be reallocated between the two units, but still total 5,000 per unit, and maintain a minimum of 1,750 per unit in Hong Kong, prove that the optimal combination of markups is a 35.0% markup at Chinglish and an 4.64% markup in Torrington Edge. What is the impact of this repositioning on consolidated after-tax profits and total tax payments? Calculate the profits of Chinglish Dirk and Torrington Edge, and the consolidated results of both, if the markup at Chinglish was increased to 35.0% and the markup at Torrington was reduced to 4.64% in the following table: (Round to the nearest British pound.) Torrington Edge (British pounds) Consolidated (British pounds) Constructing Transfer (Sales) Price per Unit Direct costs Overhead Total costs Desired markup Transfer price (sales price) Chinglish Dirk (British pounds) 10,000 1,750 11,750 3,250 Income Statement Sales price Less total costs Taxable income exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 17% and British t Fit per sition Data Table r less to ating nexpl erhead cc 50 per kup in Tor Constructing Transfer Chinglish Dirk Torrington Edge Consolidated (Sales) Price per Unit (British pounds) (British pounds) (British pounds) Direct costs 10,000 16,100 D Overhead 4,000 1,000 Total costs 14,000 17,100 D Desired markup 2,100 2,565 Transfer price (sales price) 16,100 19,665 0 19,665,000 Income Statement Sales price Less total costs Taxable income (17,100,000) 16,100,000 (14,000,000) 2,100,000 (357,000) 1,743,000 Less taxes 2,565,000 (872,100) 1,692,900 1,229,100 0 Profit, after-tax 3.435.900 Print Done ck An Homework: Chapter 15 Homework Week 12 Save Score: 0 of 1 pt 7 of 7 (4 complete) HW Score: 56.55%, 3.96 of 7 pts Question Help Problem 15-7 (algorithmic) Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 17% and British tax rates are 34%. The markup was 15% and the sales volume was 1,000 units. Chinglish calculates its profit per container as follows (all values in British pounds): Corporate management of Torrington Edge wishes to reposition profit in Hong Kong. It is, however, facing two constraints. First, the final sales price in Great Britain must be 20,000 or less to remain competitive. Secondly, the British tax authorities in working with Torrington Edge's cost accounting staff-has established a maximum transfer price allowed (from Hong Kong) of 17,800. Not to leave any potential tax repositioning opportunities unexplored, Torrington Edge wants to combine the components described above with a redistribution of overhead costs. If overhead costs could be reallocated between the two units, but still total 5,000 per unit, and maintain a minimum of 1,750 per unit in Hong Kong, prove that the optimal combination of markups is a 35.0% markup at Chinglish and an 4.64% markup in Torrington Edge. What is the impact of this repositioning on consolidated after-tax profits and total tax payments? Calculate the profits of Chinglish Dirk and Torrington Edge, and the consolidated results of both, if the markup at Chinglish was increased to 35.0% and the markup at Torrington was reduced to 4.64% in the following table: (Round to the nearest British pound.) Torrington Edge (British pounds) Consolidated (British pounds) Constructing Transfer (Sales) Price per Unit Direct costs Overhead Total costs Desired markup Transfer price (sales price) Chinglish Dirk (British pounds) 10,000 1,750 11,750 3,250 Income Statement Sales price Less total costs Taxable income exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 17% and British t Fit per sition Data Table r less to ating nexpl erhead cc 50 per kup in Tor Constructing Transfer Chinglish Dirk Torrington Edge Consolidated (Sales) Price per Unit (British pounds) (British pounds) (British pounds) Direct costs 10,000 16,100 D Overhead 4,000 1,000 Total costs 14,000 17,100 D Desired markup 2,100 2,565 Transfer price (sales price) 16,100 19,665 0 19,665,000 Income Statement Sales price Less total costs Taxable income (17,100,000) 16,100,000 (14,000,000) 2,100,000 (357,000) 1,743,000 Less taxes 2,565,000 (872,100) 1,692,900 1,229,100 0 Profit, after-tax 3.435.900 Print Done ck An

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Surviving The OSHA Audit Common Sense Solutions To Your Most Feared OSHA Compliance Issues

Authors: David A. Casavant

1st Edition

0998743704, 978-0998743707

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

=+ (b) Show that no record stands forever.

Answered: 1 week ago