Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates

Chinglish Dirk (C). Chinglish Dirk Company (Hong Kong) exports razor blades to its wholly owned parent company, Torrington Edge (Great Britain). Hong Kong tax rates are 16% and British tax rates are 30%. The markup was 15% and the sales volume was 2,500 units. Chinglish calculates its profit per container as follows (all values in British pounds):

image text in transcribedCorporate management of Torrington Edge wishes to reposition profit in Hong Kong. It is, however, facing two constraints. First, the final sales price in Great Britain must be 20,000 or less to remain competitive. Secondly, the British tax authoritiesin working with Torrington Edge's cost accounting staffhas established a maximum transfer price allowed (from Hong Kong) of 17,800.

Not to leave any potential tax repositioning opportunities unexplored, Torrington Edge wants to combine the components described above with a redistribution of overhead costs. If overhead costs could be reallocated between the two units, but still total 5,000 per unit, and maintain a minimum of 1,750 per unit in Hong Kong, prove that the optimal combination of markups is a 35.0% markup at Chinglish and an 4.64% markup in Torrington Edge. What is the impact of this repositioning on consolidated after-tax profits and total tax payments?

Calculate the profits of Chinglish Dirk and Torrington Edge, and the consolidated results of both, if the markup at Chinglish was increased to 35.0% and the markup at Torrington was reduced to 4.64% in the following table:(Round to the nearest British pound.)

image text in transcribedPlease follow the table format ^ (ignore the 0's) and I will thumbs up :)

X i Data Table Consolidated Constructing Transfer (Sales) Price per Unit Chinglish Dirk (British pounds) 10,000 (British pounds) Torrington Edge (British pounds) 16,100 1,000 Direct costs Overhead 4,000 Total costs 14,000 17,100 Desired markup 2,100 2,565 Transfer price (sales price) 16,100 19,665 Income Statement Sales price Less total costs Taxable income 40,250,000 (35,000,000) 5,250,000 (840,000) 4,410,000 49,162,500 (42,750,000) 6,412,500 (1,923,750) 4,488,750 Less taxes 2,763,750 Profit, after-tax 8,898,750 Print Done Consolidated Constructing Transfer (Sales) Price per Unit Torrington Edge (British pounds) (British pounds) Chinglish Dirk (British pounds) 10,000 1,750 Direct costs 0 Overhead 3,250 Total costs 11,750 0 0 0 Desired markup Transfer price (sales price) 0 0 Income Statement Sales price 0 | Less total costs OLOLOLO Taxable income 0 Less taxes 0 Profit, after-tax 0 0 0

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Project Finance In Theory And Practice

Authors: Stefano Gatti

3rd Edition

0128114010, 978-0128114018

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

=+21.1. Prove ( e-ux2 /2 dx =1-1/2. ,00 12 T = 00

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

places. should be chosen

Answered: 1 week ago