Question
Chip Groat, a respected scientist at The University of Texas at Austin (UT), led a study for UT's Energy Institute on the impact of hydraulic
Chip Groat, a respected scientist at The University of Texas at Austin (UT), led a study for UT's Energy Institute on the impact of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater. The study concluded there was no link between fracking and contamination of groundwater. However, Groat did not disclose that, as he conducted the study, he also sat on the board of a Houston-based drilling and fracking company, which had a clear stake in the outcome of the report. He also failed to disclose that the company paid him $400,000 in 2011, and that he received $1.6 million in company stock between 2007 and 2012. Had this information been disclosed, Groat's _____________________ would have been clear to the reading public.
A) moral muteness
B) conflict of interest
C) rationalizations
D) diffusion of responsibility
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started