Choose all of the statements that are correct regarding the AMF Slickcraft v Sleekcraft trademark infringement case that involved boats. a) AMF Slickcraft claimed there was a likelihood of confusion and also presented evidence that actual confusion had occurred in the mind of the buying public b) Upon applying the likelihood of confusion factors, the court found the trademarks to be very similar on all three levels of sight, sound, and meaning, c) the court ordered a limited injunction, Sleekcraft could continue using the name under certain conditions d) The Nescher company that sold boats under the Sleekcraft name had not cooperated with AMF Slickcraft and had engaged in bad faith behavior regarding this issue therefore the court awarded treble damages to AMF Slickcraft. e) the court ordered a full injunction, Sleekcraft must stop using the name Choose all of the statements that are correct regarding the AMF Slickcraft v Sleekcraft trademark infringement case that involved boats. a) AMF Slickcraft claimed there was a likelihood of confusion and also presented evidence that actual confusion had occurred in the mind of the buying public b) Upon applying the likelihood of confusion factors, the court found the trademarks to be very similar on all three levels of sight, sound, and meaning, c) the court ordered a limited injunction, Sleekcraft could continue using the name under certain conditions d) The Nescher company that sold boats under the Sleekcraft name had not cooperated with AMF Slickcraft and had engaged in bad faith behavior regarding this issue therefore the court awarded treble damages to AMF Slickcraft. e) the court ordered a full injunction, Sleekcraft must stop using the name