Choose an organization that has adjusted, adapted, or redefined itself to withstand the test of time. Create a concept map illustrating the organization's innovative progression that led to its success. In your concept map, include the following:

1. The name of the organization and its innovation.
2. Trends that led to the innovation.
3. Innovation-related values and vision of the organization.
4. Steps and strategies that led to the organization's innovative success.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writingis expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric below

5. Target9 points

The name of the organization and its innovation are thorough and include substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable7.83 points

The name of the organization and its innovation are complete and provide relevant supporting detail.

3. Approaching7.11 points

The name of the organization and its innovation are included but lack relevant supporting detail.

2. Insufficient6.66 points

The name of the organization and its innovation are unclear and incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

The name of the organization and its innovation are not included.

Innovation Trends18 pointsCriteria Description

Innovation Trends

5. Target18 points

Trends that led to the innovation are thorough and include substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable15.66 points

Trends that led to the innovation are complete and provide relevant supporting detail.

3. Approaching14.22 points

Trends that led to the innovation are included but lack relevant supporting detail.

2. Insufficient13.32 points

Trends that led to the innovation are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Trends that led to the innovation are not included.

Values and Vision18 pointsCriteria Description

Values and Vision

5. Target18 points

Innovation related values and vision of the organization are thorough and include substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable15.66 points

Innovation related values and vision of the organization are complete and provide relevant supporting detail.

3. Approaching14.22 points

Innovation related values and vision of the organization are included but lack relevant supporting detail.

2. Insufficient13.32 points

Innovation-related values and vision of the organization are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Innovation-related values and vision of the organization are not included.

Steps and Strategies27 pointsCriteria Description

Steps and Strategies

5. Target27 points

Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are thorough and include substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable23.49 points

Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are complete and provide relevant supporting detail.

3. Approaching21.33 points

Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are included but lack relevant supporting detail.

2. Insufficient19.98 points

Steps or strategies that led to organizational innovative success are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Steps and strategies that led to organizational innovative success are not included.

Concepts4.5 pointsCriteria Description

Concepts

5. Target4.5 points

Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style.

4. Acceptable3.92 points

Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. An original and creative concept fulfills the parameters of assignment.

3. Approaching3.56 points

Main concept is easily identified, and few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Only a basic understanding of assignment is present.

2. Insufficient3.33 points

Main concept is not clearly identified, and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Main concept is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea.

Aesthetic Quality4.5 pointsCriteria Description

Aesthetic Quality

5. Target4.5 points

Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.

4. Acceptable3.92 points

Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.

3. Approaching3.56 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.

2. Insufficient3.33 points

Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content, or the purpose of presentation is low quality.

Presentation4.5 pointsCriteria Description

Presentation

5. Target4.5 points

The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable3.92 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

3. Approaching3.56 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

2. Insufficient3.33 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

Mechanics of Writing