Choose... Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill This is a product liability case that Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young enforces the legal principle that Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company injury, no matter how substantial, Rylands v. Fletcher does not guarantee that others will Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council be held liable as negligence must Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. still be proven. R. v. Spratt More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. In this case it was determined that, Yin v. Liu for situations of negligent Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. misstatements causing economic Hadley v. Baxendale loss, a duty of care is owed where it Haig v. Bamford is foreseeable that clients would Donoghue v. Stevenson rely on the advice of the Choose... professionals providing that advice; and, furthermore, that professionals are held to a higher standard