Cohen v. Brown, 101 F.3d 155 *; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30192 Answer: 1. What actions did Brown University take that caused them to be sued by Cohen - and the other similarly positioned Brown female student-athletes? How did this move bring them out of Title IX compliance? 2. Brown Univeristy is advancing an argument that the lower court's decision is "affirmative action". In the eyes of the law, what constitutes "affirmative action"? How does that align with Title IX? 3. Why does Brown not comply with Title IX through the third prong (of the three prong test) in accommodating interests of the underrepresented gender? 4. Explain the role of the Policy Interpretation, and how this case relates to its legality. Mercer v. Duke, 190 F.3d 643 *; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15502 Answer: 1. Who is Heather Mercer, and why is she alleging that she was discriminated against? 2. Why does the constant sports exemption not apply as a defense for Duke?