collect your answers as a homework grade. 1. Why does Ericsson use a similar reference point to open and close---and thus to frame her essay? In what ways does this strategy lead to cohesion? 2. Identify examples of informal language in this essay. Is it appropriate and effective Or is it distracting? 3. Do any of Ericsson's types of lying seem to have logical fallacies? Which ones? (For instance, is deflecting the same as a red herring?) 4. What is the intended purpose of the quotations at the start of each type of lie? Are they intended to be humorous, inspirational, and ironic? 5. List the sources of Ericcson's examples, (such as business acquaintance, different authors, etc.) Does this variety help her meaning or does it fragment the essay