1. Columbia wont discriminate on the basis of religious belief. Historically, some creeds have been singled out more than others for abuse, but one thats not often found on the list of mistreatment is Haitian voodooism. Houngan Hector of New Jersey identifies himself as an asogwe priest of Haitian voodoo. His story is interesting. He claims to have been mounted by an ancestor at the age of seven, and so began his spiritual journey. Eventually, it led Houngan Hector to perform spiritual cleansings for money. They havent always gone well. According to this newspaper story in the Philadelphia Daily News, Lucille Hamilton paid $621 to have her spiritual grime removed by voodoo high priest Houngan Hector in an ordinary townhouse in Camden County. Hamilton, 21, a male living as a woman, flew in on Friday from her home in Little Rock, Arkansas to take part in the three-day spiritual cleansing. By Saturday night Hamilton was dead, and authorities are awaiting results of an autopsy and toxicology tests to determine exactly what happened.

   Heres Houngan Hectors advertisement for his services on his Myspace page, as it was reported in Odd Culture: I have over 15 years of experience helping individuals resolve their issues, and well over 9 years of helping people through the means of the Haitian Voodoo tradition. Having gotten individuals out of jail, brought lovers back, and improved peoples financial situation, I keep myself humble remembering it is not I who does it. It is God and Ginen who resolves.

   The three basic ethical arguments against discrimination (and, in this case, discrimination based on personal religious belief) are fairness, rights, and utilitarianism.

   1. Choose one and make the case that Houngan Hectorwho was never charged with any crimeshould be treated like any other applicant for a job at Columbia University.

   2. Can any of the three arguments be used to show that discriminating against Haitian voodoo believers is ethically acceptable even recommendable?