Comment on the Bangladesh fire case. Be sure to call upon ethical frameworks and/or reasoning advanced in the readings to make your arguments. (Seriously: this is not the place for mere opinions about right and wrong.) Address: 1) the morally appropriate distribution of ethical burden for preventing future tragedies of this type; 2) the most pragmatic distribution of burden for achieving desired ends in the global world we live in, today, and say why they may differ. Address, if you can, the extent to which employment in 'sweatshops' is truly voluntary in the sense meant by modern economists, who justify the risks by the freedoms they say are implied by unregulated solutions.