comment on the risks and opportunities for CPAs presented by new marijuana laws. The main issue is that marijuana is still illegal at the federal level but has now been legalized by a number of states. When there is a conflict of laws such as this, should CPAs jump in as leaders or hang back and wait for clarity? As a CPA, would you feel the need comfortable working with clients in the cannabis industry?

RELATED October 24, 2016 MAP survey: Firms continue to grow revenue October 1, 2016 Use standard terms to build a liability shield September 1, 2016 Risk management: Worth its SALT Voters approved marijuana initiatives in eight of the nine states where the issue was on the ballot Nov. 8, allowing for the creation of new businesses that will need CPA services. However, because marijuana remains illegal at the federal level, CPAs will need to carefully consider potential risks associated with businesses operating in this industry. TOPICS Professional Ethics Firm Practice Management Practice Growth and Client Service California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada approved the use of recreational marijuana, although voters in Arizona rejected a similar measure. Medical marijuana remains legal in that state, however. On the medical side, voters in Arkansas, Florida, and North Dakota approved legalizing medical marijuana, while voters in Montana approved expanding the state's existing medical marijuana program. Nationwide, 31 states and jurisdictions now have legal marijuana in some capacity Businesses in this industry are increasingly seeking CPA services, with some statessuch as Arizona and Minnesota- mandating that marijuana retailers undergo an annual audit. At the same time, however, most state boards of accountancy have not issued official guidance as to whether providing services to these businesses would constitute a violation of the board's rules of professional conduct. Thus far, only state boards of accountancy in Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington have issued guidance. Generally speaking, each of these boards has determined that providing accounting services to state-legal marijuana businesses is not itself an act discreditable. However, a board could pursue disciplinary action against a licensee found guilty of a criminal act involving marijuana. A listing of each board's specific guidance is available here. The AICPA has also developed resources for CPAs considering offering services to state-legal marijuana businesses, including the paper An Issue Brief on State Marijuana Laws and the CPA Profession, which will be updated in early 2017 AICPA Insights also published a recent blog post on the issue, and more tools are available on the AICPA website. Lindsay Patterson is the AICPA's senior communications manager for state regulatory & legislative affairs. To comment on this article, contact Chris Baysden, senior manager of newsletters at the AICPA