Commerce is the interaction between a buyer and seller. Using Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal , 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) court case, describe what the case was about and the courts decision as it relates to this idea of commerce, specifically interstate commerce. Give a description of the case and answer the following questions below.

a) When a land-use regulation completely destroys the land's economic value, is it a taking requiring just compensation? What is a taking and how does it relate to this case?

b) Are the actions by government in this case consistent with government for a self-governing people? Are the actions by government in this case within either the Protective State or the Productive State?

c). How did the actions of government through the segregation ordinance fail to uphold the principles of a self governing people?

d) Are the written constitutional rules relevant to this case consistent with constituting government for a self-governing people?

e) Is the court's opinion regarding the constitutionality of the government action consistent with the written constitution?

f) How did the courts decision limit or affect interstate commerce? If at all?

g) Was police power clearly defined in this case, why or why not?