Commercial law (UCC article 2) Essay

TheGPL companies manufacture and sell cedarshakes.In thespring of 2012, Feaver, GPL's sales representative, met with Conley, a shaketrader forL-P. In May 2012, Feaver and Conley reached anoral agreement forL-P to buy a large quantity ofcedarshakes from GPL.Feaver filled out andsigned sixofGPL's four

-,

) partorderconfirmationforms.Eachpartstatedthepricesandquantitiesof

product beingsold to L-P.Feaver sent L-P thetop two copies of each ofthesixfourpartorderconfirmationforms...

Thereafter, theprice ofshakes dropped and L-P'sneeds forcedarshakes changed. Feaver and Conley continued tonegotiate.In June or early July, 2012, GPL's Clarke also negotiated with Conley about thesame matters.After talking with Conley, Clarke wrotea new order, revising theprices and quantities ofproduct beingsold to L-P.Clarkethen telephoned GPL's employee, Sherlock, and told himtosendwrittenconfirmations oftheneworderstoL-P.Sherlock didso,using GPL's confirmation forms, which hesigned.Each formstated theprices and quantities ofproduct being sold to L-P.L-P did not object.

InJuly 2012,L-P accepted delivery of 13truckloads ofshakes fromGPL.When L-Pdidnotrequestdeliveryoftheremainder oftheorder,GPLbecameconcerned andcontacted L-P, asserting that it had a contract todeliver 75additional truckloads ofcedarshakes.L-Presponded that ithadagreed to purchaseonlythe 13truckloads that ithad already received.GPLcompanies then brought this action to recover their losses.

Whatresult?Fullydiscussallissuespresented.

)