Compare and contrast the historical experiences, legal cases, and/or personalities involving African-Americans and Latinos. How are these experiences similar? How are they different? (CAN NOT INCLUDE THE CASES OF BROWN VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION OR MENDEZ VS. WESTMINSTER)use references belowhttps://www.mediafire.com/file/jxsgwdoysi5v9wd/Latinos+have+many+skin+tones.pdf/filehttps://wapo.st/30m85UYhttps://pewrsr.ch/3SKjMOUhttps://aspira.org/about-us/aspiras-legal-landmark-cases/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html

Plessy v. Ferguson/>/> Facts of the Case-The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy--who was seven-eighths Caucasian--took a seat in a "whites only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested. Question Presented-Is Louisiana's law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment? Conclusion-No, the state law is within constitutional boundaries. The majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation. The justices based their decision on the separate-but- equal doctrine, that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. (The phrase, "separate but equal" was not part of the opinion.) Brown conceded that the 14th amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law. But Brown noted that "in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races unsatisfactory to either." In short, segregation does not in itself constitute unlawful discrimination