1. CompareNear v. MinnesotaandUnited States v. Progressive, Inc.Which case held that the prior restraint on speech was constitutional, and which case held the restraint was unconstitutional? Why?
2. CompareTexas v. Johnson andBarnes v. Glenn Theatre.Both of these cases involved expressive conduct.Why was the conduct protected in one case, but not the other?
3. CompareBrandenburg v. OhioandChaplinksy. Why was the speech protected inBrandenburg --but not inChaplinsky?
4. It's been called the most powerful dissent in American history?What was Justice Holmes'sremedy for speech that was considered "bad" speech. And what did Melvin Nimmermean by the dangers of "elitism."(as discussed in your textbook).
5. Provide a link to a news articles in which a university, group, or organization has attempted to suppress "bad" speech (e.g., by protesting or banning a speaker) in contradiction of the remedies proposed by Holmes and Nimmer.