Compare the remedy granted to the plaintiffs inWaltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387with the remedy given inSidhu v Van Dyke(2014) 251 CLR 505.

Is there aclear set of principlesto be appliedin determining the appropriate remedyin a case of equitable estoppel, and if so,are these principles justified,given the potential for equitable estoppel toundermine strict contract law principles?

Consider a range of case law in your analysis.