Question
Complete the following questions: ( I have also included the questions in an attachment in case it does not come out properly) 19-34Compensation linked with
Complete the following questions: ( I have also included the questions in an attachment in case it does not come out properly)
- 19-34Compensation linked with profitability, waiting time, and quality measures.Seashore Healthcare operates two medical groups, one in Philadelphia and one in Baltimore. The semiannual bonus plan for each medical group?s president has three components:
- a.Profitability performance. Add 1.50% of operating income.
- b.Average patient waiting time. Add $30,000 if the average waiting time for a patient to see a doctor after the scheduled appointment time is less than 15 minutes. If average patient waiting time is more than 15 minutes, add nothing.
- c.Patient satisfaction performance. Deduct $35,000 if patient satisfaction (measured using a survey asking patients about their satisfaction with their doctor and their overall satisfaction with Seashore Healthcare) falls below 65 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). No additional bonus is awarded for satisfaction scores of 65 or more.
January?June
July?December
Philadelphia
Operating income
$11,150,000
$10,000,000
Average waiting time
13 minutes
17 minutes
Patient satisfaction
72
66
Baltimore
Operating income
$8,800,000
$7,500,000
Average waiting time
20 minutes
13 minutes
Patient satisfaction
59
68
Required- 1.Compute the bonuses paid in each half year of 2013 to the Philadelphia and Baltimore medical group presidents.
- 2.Discuss the validity of the components of the bonus plan as measures of profitability, waiting time performance, and patient satisfaction. Suggest one shortcoming of each measure and how it might be overcome (by redesign of the plan or by another measure).
- 3.Why do you think Seashore Healthcare includes measures of both operating income and waiting time in its bonus plan for group presidents? Give one example of what might happen if waiting time was dropped as a performance measure.
- 19-35Ethics and quality.Weston Corporation manufactures auto parts for two leading Japanese automakers. Nancy Evans is the management accountant for one of Weston?s largest manufacturing plants. The plant?s general manager, Chris Sheldon, has just returned from a meeting at corporate headquarters where quality expectations were outlined for 2014. Chris calls Nancy into his office to relay the corporate quality objective that total quality costs will not exceed 10% of total revenues by plant under any circumstances. Chris asks Nancy to provide him with a list of options for meeting corporate headquarters? quality objective. The plant?s initial budgeted revenues and quality costs for 2014 are as follows:
Prior to receiving the new corporate quality objective, Nancy had collected information for all of the plant?s possible options for improving both product quality and costs of quality. She was planning to introduce the idea of reengineering the manufacturing process at a one-time cost of $112,500, which would decrease product inspection costs by approximately 25% per year and was expected to reduce warranty repairs and customer support by an estimated 40% per year. After seeing the new corporate objective, Nancy is reconsidering the reengineering idea.Nancy returns to her office and crunches the numbers again to look for other alternatives. She concludes that by increasing the cost of quality control training for production staff by $22,500 per year, the company would reduce inspection costs by 10% annually and reduce warranty repairs and customer support costs by 20% per year as well. She is leaning toward only presenting this latter option to Chris because this is the only option that meets the new corporate quality objective.RequiredRevenue
5,100,000
Quality costs:
Testing of purchased materials
48,000
Quality control training for production staff
7,500
Warranty repairs
123,000
Quality design engineering
72,000
Customer support
55,500
Materials scrap
18,000
Product inspection
153,000
Engineering redesign of failed parts
31,500
Rework of failed parts
27,000
- 1.Calculate the ratio of each budgeted costs-of-quality category (prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure) to budgeted revenues for 2014. Are the budgeted total costs of quality as a percentage of budgeted revenues currently less than 10%?
- 2.Which of the two quality options should Nancy propose to the general manager, Chris Sheldon? Show the 2-year outcome for each option: (a) reengineer the manufacturing process for $112,500 and (b) increase quality training expenditure by $22,500 per year.
- 3.Suppose Nancy decides not to present the reengineering option to Chris. Is Nancy?s action unethical? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started