Complete the following questions: Please state the rule of law, Analysis, and do conclusion for each question. im giving extra money for the correct answers.

1. Sara and Mark Adey hired White Plumbing and Heating to install a new heating system in the home that they purchased. The home had been vacant for quite some time after the previous owner removed the original heating system and then put the home up for sale before completing renovations.It took White two weeks to complete the work, however when the city came in for the final inspection they noted that the system had been installed improperly.The city inspector also noted that the system was not working properly and that there was a heavy odor present when the heating system was turned on.After the inspection failed the Adeys refused to pay White Plumbing.White sued claiming they should be paid for substantially performing the contract.What is the outcome?
2. Consigli Construction entered into a contract with the state of Massachusetts for repairs to the Middlesex Courthouse. The contract was covered by a 2-year statute of limitations clause.Consigli subcontracted some of the work to Darragh Electrical.The contract with Darragh required that any claim against Consigli must be made within 120 days.Darragh filed a claim for damages after the 120 days had passed claiming that the 2-year statute of limitations applied not the 120 days included in the contract.What is the outcome?
3. Ainsley Jones owes Joseph Hyde $75,000 due on January 1st. On December 5th, Jones offers Hyde her condo in New Hampshire instead of the money owed.Hyde accepts as long as Jones transfers ownership of the condo to Hyde by December 31st.Jones does not transfer the deed to the condo on December 31st.Shortly thereafter Hyde sues for the $75,000 that Jones owed.Jones claims that the contract was discharged by accord and satisfaction.What is the outcome?