Conduct a proposed (and approved) experiment from Lab 5 (i dropped an almond, orange, and a egg in a plate of sugar to measure the craters and got diameter for the almond is 2cm, height would be 2.7 cm, and for the egg the diameter is 4.5cm and height is 5cm, and the orange is a diameter of 5.5cm and a height of 5.7cm.) Make sure to record data If you end up doing everything exactly as you described in Lab 5, then feel free to copy your hypothesis, materials, methods, and control case from Lab 5.

Hypothesis to be tested:

List of materials used:

Methods used:

Control case:

Results (organize results in a table). The exact format of the table will vary depending on the details of the experiment. It should look similar to the tables from Lab 5.

You might have data on impactor size/weight/composition, height, relative velocity (e.g. thrown vs. dropped, slingshot), the medium (sand/salt/sugar/other), depth of the "craters", width of the "craters", length of "rays", crater shape, or descriptions. It all depends on your setup.

In the end you should be taking an average of multiple runs of the same experiment (as you did in the first cratering lab), so your table should include all of the trials you did, along with the average. If you want to, feel free to submit your table in Excel format as a separate document.

Write a conclusion. you need to summarize and explain your findings; include whether or not your results agreed with your hypothesis and discuss any issues you encountered:

In this lab, your experiments were probably limited by factors such as available materials, measurement tools, and inherent differences between the experimental setup and actual impact processes. In 3 sentences, is there anything you wish you could have done differently, or any experimental techniques you wish you'd had access to?