Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Consider a similar problem to invest in developing a natural resource field but over 2 periods. The investment involves buying a lease that costs I

Consider a similar problem to invest in developing a natural resource field but over 2 periods.
The investment involves buying a lease that costs I0=30 M upfront (at t =0) that provides a
compound option (first option leading to a subsequent option) giving the right at t =1 to invest I1=
80 M to receive (at t =1) the base-scale (first-stage) project cash flow value V plus an option to
subsequently (at t =2) make an additional investment I2=40 M (decision-tree like representation)
to expand (processing) capacity by 50%. Assume dt =1 step per year, multiplicative up and down
parameters, u =2 and d =0.5, and risk-adjusted (risk-neutral) probability p =0.367, r =0.05.
Draw three binomial trees (over t =0,1,2) as follows:
(three parts, 10 marks all)
(a) One binomial tree for the underlying project value (V)(assume V0=100 M)
(b) a second binomial tree for the last (expansion) option, showing the expansion
option payoff at t =2(write the formula). What is the current (t =0) value of
the option to expand capacity by 50% by paying cost I2=40 M at t =2?
(c) a third binomial tree for the first (compound) option to invest in the base scale
project in the first stage at t =1(showing its payoff at t =1 to pay I1=80 M to
acquire the first-stage base project value V plus the follow-on expansion
option). What is the current (t =0) value of the first (compound) option?In above, show the appropriate values (numbers) on all nodes (states) on all three
binomial trees and show your basic calculations e.g., for the option payoffs and
calculated option values along each binomial tree on the side (margin).What is the time-0 net value (Expanded-NPV) of this investment opportunity (after
accounting for the upfront lease cost of I0=30 M)? Should you acquire the lease?
What is the maximum you would pay for it?
(iv) Now suppose you are to solve the above 2-year problem using N =4 steps to divide
the 2-year maturity (of the option to expand), using annualized \sigma of 0.693. What will
then be the multiplicative up and down parameters u and d and the risk-adjusted
probability p, assuming no competitive damage or other form of dividend yield(\delta =
0)? What would p be instead if there is a 4% competitive erosion in project value V (\delta
=0.04)?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Advanced Accounting

Authors: Joe Hoyle, Thomas Schaefer, Timothy Doupnik

10th edition

0-07-794127-6, 978-0-07-79412, 978-0077431808

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What attribute should the opening html tag of any web page have?

Answered: 1 week ago