Question
Consider a simple protocol for transferring files over a link. After some initial negotiation, A sends data packets of size 1 KB to B; B
Consider a simple protocol for transferring files over a link. After some initial negotiation, A sends data packets of size 1 KB to B; B the replies with an acknowledgement. A always waits for each ACK before sending the next data packet; this is known as stop and wait. Packets that are overdue are presumed lost and are retransmitted. a) In the absence of packet losses or duplications, explain why it is not necessary to include sequence number data in the packet header. b) Suppose that the link can lose occasional packets, but that the packets that do arrive always arrive in the order sent. Is a 2-bit sequence number (that is, N mod 4) enough for A and B to detect and resend any lost packets? Is a 1 bit sequence number enough? c) Now suppose that the link can deliver out of order and that sometimes a packet can be delivered as much as 1 minute after subsequent packets. How does this change the sequence number requirements?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started