Consider a three-firm supply chain consisting of a retailer, manufacturer, and supplier. The retailer's demand over an 8 -week period was 90 units each of the first 2 weeks, 210 units each of the second 2 weeks, 280 units each of the third 2 weeks, and 420 units each of the fourth 2 weeks. The following table presents the orders placed by each firm in the supply chain. Notice, as is often the case in supply chains due to economies of scale, that total units are the same in each case, but firms further up the supply chain (away from the retailer) place larger, less frequent, orders. a) What is the bullwhip measure for the retailer? The bullwhip measure for the retaller is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) b) What is the bullwhip measure for the manufacturer? The bullwhip measure for the manufacturer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) c) What is the bullwhip measure for the supplier? The bullwhip measure for the supplier is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) d) What conclusions can you draw regarding the impact that economies of scale may have on the bullhip effect? Select all of the correct statements below. A. The effect of decreasing variance of orders with the less frecuent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes. B. Larger, less frequent orders imply a smaller variance of orders. C. Larger, less frequent orders imply a larger variance of crders. D. The effect of increasing variance of orders with the less frequent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes