Consider a three-firm supply chain consisting of a retailer, manufacturer, and supplier. The retailer's demand over an 8-week period was 90 units each of the first 2 weeks 210 units each of the second 2 wocks, 310 units each of the third 2 weeks, and 400 unts each of the fourth 2 wooks. The following table presents the orders placed by each firm in the supply chain. Notice, as is often the case in supply chains due to economies of scale, that total units are the same in each case, but firms further up the supply chain (away from the retailer place larger, loss frequent, orders. Click the icon to view the orders placed by each firm in the supply chain Click the icon to view the ways of calculating the variance a) What is the bullwhip measure for the retailer? The bullwhip measure for the retailer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) b) What is the bullwhip measure for the manufacturer? The bullwhip measure for the manufacturer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) c) What is the bullwhip measure for the supplier? The bulwhip measure for the supplier is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) d) What conclusions can you draw regarding the impact that economies of scale may have on the bullwhip effect? Click to select your answer(s). The bullwhip measure for the retailer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) b) What is the bullwhip measure for the manufacturer? The bullwhip measure for the manufacturer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) c) What is the bullwhip measure for the supplier? The bullwhip measure for the supplier is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) d) What conclusions can you draw regarding the impact that economies of scalo may have on the bullwhip effect? Select all of the correct statements below. A. The effect of increasing variance of orders with the less frequent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes. B. The effect of decreasing variance of orders with the less frequent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes. C. Larger, less frequent orders imply a smaller variance of orders, D. Larger, less frequent orders imply a larger variance of orders. D 27 HX GWhen X ( 7 G The hux StuderX Microsx 0 Mail X Micro /Player Test.aspx?testid=221274308 2020 corey r 11 and 115 1 of 2 ng of a retailer, manufacturer and supplier. The retailer's demand over an 8-week period was 90 units each of the first 2 weeks, 210 un its each of the fourth 2 wool chain. Notice, as is often the same in each case, but firm More Info x jent, orders d by each firm in the supply ulating the variance. ailer? Week Retailer Manufacturer Supplier 1 90 180 600 - (Enter your response round 2 90 3 210 420 nufacturer? 4 210 5 310 620 1,420 is. (Enter your respons 310 7 400 800 aplier? 8 400 (Enter your response roup g the impact that economie Print Done O RE E g Consider a three-firm supply chain consisting of a retailer, manufacturer, and supplier. The retailer's demand over an 8-week period was 90 units each of the first 2 weeks 210 units each of the second 2 wocks, 310 units each of the third 2 weeks, and 400 unts each of the fourth 2 wooks. The following table presents the orders placed by each firm in the supply chain. Notice, as is often the case in supply chains due to economies of scale, that total units are the same in each case, but firms further up the supply chain (away from the retailer place larger, loss frequent, orders. Click the icon to view the orders placed by each firm in the supply chain Click the icon to view the ways of calculating the variance a) What is the bullwhip measure for the retailer? The bullwhip measure for the retailer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) b) What is the bullwhip measure for the manufacturer? The bullwhip measure for the manufacturer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) c) What is the bullwhip measure for the supplier? The bulwhip measure for the supplier is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) d) What conclusions can you draw regarding the impact that economies of scale may have on the bullwhip effect? Click to select your answer(s). The bullwhip measure for the retailer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) b) What is the bullwhip measure for the manufacturer? The bullwhip measure for the manufacturer is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) c) What is the bullwhip measure for the supplier? The bullwhip measure for the supplier is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) d) What conclusions can you draw regarding the impact that economies of scalo may have on the bullwhip effect? Select all of the correct statements below. A. The effect of increasing variance of orders with the less frequent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes. B. The effect of decreasing variance of orders with the less frequent orders could be reduced via channel coordination by determining lot sizes. C. Larger, less frequent orders imply a smaller variance of orders, D. Larger, less frequent orders imply a larger variance of orders. D 27 HX GWhen X ( 7 G The hux StuderX Microsx 0 Mail X Micro /Player Test.aspx?testid=221274308 2020 corey r 11 and 115 1 of 2 ng of a retailer, manufacturer and supplier. The retailer's demand over an 8-week period was 90 units each of the first 2 weeks, 210 un its each of the fourth 2 wool chain. Notice, as is often the same in each case, but firm More Info x jent, orders d by each firm in the supply ulating the variance. ailer? Week Retailer Manufacturer Supplier 1 90 180 600 - (Enter your response round 2 90 3 210 420 nufacturer? 4 210 5 310 620 1,420 is. (Enter your respons 310 7 400 800 aplier? 8 400 (Enter your response roup g the impact that economie Print Done O RE E g