Consider each of the following: The prices at all the restaurants I've visited in Santa Fe were at least 10% higher than prices for comparable food in restaurants in Fayetteville. I should expect to pay at least 10% more at the next restaurant than I would in Fayetteville. Which of the following is true about this passage? (Only one answer is correct.) Group of answer choices The passage draws an analogy between restaurants in Santa Fe and Fayetteville by suggesting both have high prices. The passage uses analogical reasoning to suggest that the food at restaurants in Santa Fe and Fayetteville is good. This passage uses analogical reasoning to conclude that what was true of the restaurants in Santa Fe (that their prices are 10% higher than in Fayetteville) will be true of the next restaurant I visit in Santa Fe. The passage is a deductive argument by claiming that it must be true that Santa Fe prices are more expensive than Fayetteville's. This passage is not really an argument since the premise about restaurant prices is neither true or false