Consider RFPA as a response to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Miller. Does it fail to provide meaningful protection for customer financial records? Is it justified by the nature of the threats our society faces from terrorism and international organized crime?

1. Right to Financial Privacy Act, USC 3401-3422 (selected sections) Right to Financial Privacy Act, USC 3401-3422 (selected sections) - Alternative Formats 2. United States v. Miller, 96 S.Ct. 1619 (1976) (selections) United States v. Miller, 96 S.Ct. 1619 (1976) (selections) - Alternative Formats 3. Anderson v. La Junta State Bank, 115 F.3d 756 (1997) Anderson v. La Junta State Bank, 115 F.3d 756 (1997) - Alternative Formats 4. Tabet v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, 2012 WL 3205581 (unpublished opinion) Tabet v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, 2012 WL 3205581 (unpublished opinion) - Alternative Formats

5. Daniel J. Solove & Woodrow Hartzog, The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 583, 585-590(2014) Daniel J. Solove & Woodrow Hartzog, The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 583, 585-590(2014) - Alternative Formats

6. Congressional Research Service, "EU Data Protection Rules and U.S. Implications (Updated July 17, 2020) Congressional Research Service, "EU Data Protection Rules and U.S. Implications (Updated July 17, 2020) - Alternative Formats

7. FDIC Consumer Compliance Examination Manual, VIII. Privacy-Right to Financial Privacy Act (June 2006) FDIC Consumer Compliance Examination Manual, VIII. Privacy-Right to Financial Privacy Act (June 2006) - Alternative Formats