Question
Consider the following cash flows: Cash flow -150 100 -200 175 400 250 Time 0 1 2 3 4 5 The cost of capital is
Consider the following cash flows:
Cash flow -150 100 -200 175 400 250
Time 0 1 2 3 4 5
The cost of capital is 10%. What is the MIRR? Answer as a percentage with 2 decimals. Do not include the % symbol.
Consider the MIRR and the IRR. Which of the following is true?
| For independent projects both the MIRR and IRR provide the same recommendations as the NPV |
| For mutually exclusive projects both the MIRR and IRR provide better recommendations than the NPV |
| There is always only 1 IRR |
| The reinvestment rate for the IRR is the WACC |
Consider the following information for projects K and W:
Project K: NPV = $1,500 IRR = 20%
Project W: NPV = $2,500 IRR = 15%
Assume Project K and Project W are independent projects with a WACC = 10%. Which of the following is true?
| Both Projects K and W should be enacted since both have a positive NPV |
| Neither Project K or W should be enacted since both have a positive NPV |
| Only Project K should be enacted since it has the highest IRR |
| Only Project W should be enacted since it has the highest NPV |
Consider the following information for projects K and W:
Project K: NPV = $1,500 IRR = 20%
Project W: NPV = $2,500 IRR = 15%
Assume Project K and Project W are mutually exclusive projects with a WACC = 10%. Which of the following is true?
| Only Project W should be enacted since it has the highest NPV |
| Neither Project K or W should be enacted since both have a positive NPV |
| Only Project K should be enacted since it has the highest IRR |
| Both Projects K and W should be enacted since both have a positive NPV |
Consider the following series of cash flows:
Cash Flow: -50 20 10 10 20 20
Time: 0 1 2 3 4 5
If you are using a 10% discount rate, which of the following is true?
| Payback will be larger than discounted payback |
| Payback and discounted payback will be the same |
| Payback will be smaller than discounted payback |
| Payback and discounted payback will both be less than 0 |
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. However, if the firm does not deal with the problem at year 0 they would face a lawsuit at the end of the project (year 5) at a cost of $20 million. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million for 5 years. The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is 12%. Below is a summary of possible outcomes:
NPV with mitigation costs at time 0 included = $2.1 million
NPV without mitigation costs at time 0 and a lawsuit included in year 5 = $0.75 million
Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation at time 0?
| No, the NPVs are positive for every possible scenario. |
| Yes, the project should be undertaken and the mitigation expense should be conducted at time 0. |
| Yes, the project should be undertaken and no mitigation should be conducted at time 0. |
| No, the project is too risky and should not be undertaken. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started