Consider the following consumption function: El. c = so + can, keeping in mind that YD indicates disposable income. which can be allocated only between consumption needs and savings. Derive the eguation for savings. What is the dening fonnula for MPC.' in general? Explain what it means in sentences and what it measures. What is the value of MPt'.' for the given consumption function? [nterpret the value in sentences. What is the dening formula for MP5 [Marginal Propensity to Save} in general? Explain what it means in sentences and what it measures. What is the value of MP5 for the given consumption function? interpret the value in sentences. Given that disposable income can get split only between consumption and savings. what is the logical relationship between MPIE.' and MRS? What are the formulas forAPt.' and APE in general? How should they be interpreted? Derive the expressions for APC'and APE given the equations for consumption and savings in this question. Given that disposable income can get split only between consumption and savings. what is the logical relationship between APC.' and APS? Looking at the equations above. does. in general. MPE.'change with changes in disposable incolne? Under what conditionlfs} will it remain constant as disposable income changes? \"What about AFC: does it._ in general. change with disposable income? Under what conditionlfs} will it remain constant as disposable income changes? Fill out the following table and veri__fv,_ if what you found above is validated: Plot both consumption and savings relationships on one grid with consumption and saving shown on the vertical axis and disposable income on the horizontal axis. Using me property of the 45o line, explain and indicate where savings would be zero. Assuming that the desired aggregate expenditure is dened as the sum of desired consumption and investment expenditures in the absence of a govermnent and foreign trade [AB = C + l). Let's assume that desired investment expenditures (I) is autonolnous and xed at $30 billion. First, given the absence of a government sector to tax econolnic activity and pay households via transfer payments, what can be said about aggregate actual disposable income and actual national income? Considering your answers so far, write down the system of equations that dene this macro economy? How many unknowns and equations are this system composed of? What is the equilibrium condition that defines the equilibrium actual national income? Considering your answer to part k. replace the equations you have for the components of AE into its dening expression given to you above. Interpret this equation. . Given your answer to the previous part. what is the size of the marginal propensity to spend? Interpret it. Solve for equilibrium national income and indicate here every step you take. What are the equilibrium levels of desired consumption and investment expenditures? Putting actual income on the horizontal axis, preciser plot consumption and investment curves in a graph, and graphically derive me AE curve on the salne plot. How can the equilibrium condition be shown on mis plot? Clearly show the equilibrium point and the equilibrium national income. What is me size of me simple multiplier in this example? Interpret it. If due to extreme pessimism of both rms and households about future current desired investment declines to $15 billion and current desired consumption expenditures changes to C = [5 + DAY, explain in English how this affects the position of the curves and the equilibrium national income. Calculate the new equilibritun national income using the concept of the simple multiplier. [1' due to the pessimism about future, on top of the same changes in desired investment and consumption expenditures as in part (q). the propensity to consume from disposable income household also declined by 62.5%. explain in English how this would all affect the position of the curves and the equilibrium income. This time show these changes in a graph and predict whether equilibrium national income should decline more or less than in previous part (q). Calculate the new equilibrium using me new simple multiplier given the initial equilibrium. Now, calculate the new equilibrium national income after all the changes introduced in part (r) by solving the resulting new system of equations. Do you see any differences between the level of equilibrium national income you derive here and your answer to the previous part based on using the multiplier