1. Consider the following fact pattern.Mr. Stephens entered into a Contract with Ms. Weaver to add a roof to her house.Mr. Stephens assumed that the house belonged to Ms. Weaver's parents; however, the house actually belonged to Ms. Weaver, who is 16 years old.When Ms. Weaver declined to pay for the roof, Mr. Stephens filed suit, arguing that the roof was a Necessary.Pretend that you are a lawyer for each side, and put forth your best arguments as to why the roof was or was not a Necessary.
2. Explain the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and provide your an example