Consider the following independent Cases that relate to service department cost allocations:

Case l: Seeb LLC has two service departments [Human Resources (HR) and Information Systems (IS)] and two production departments (Machining [MD] and Assembly [AD]). HR cost is allocated by using the direct method based on the number of personnel in each department. For the period just ended, there were 189 employees in MD and Machining received OMR90,000 of HR's overhead of OMR200,000. How many employees are in the AD?

Case II: Ahmed (the Financial Controller of Seeb LLC) wants service department managers to be aware that their use of other service departments costs the firm a substantial amount of money. Would Ahmed prefer the direct method or the step-down method of cost allocation? Explain?

Case III: Seeb LLC has four service departments (S1, S2, S3, and S4) and two production departments (P1 and P2). The costs of S1 are allocated first, followed in order by the costs of S2, S3, and S4. Seeb LLC uses the step- down method, and the costs of S2 are allocated based on the number of computer hours used. Computer hours logged during the period were as follows: S1 (4,600); S2 (7,100); S3 (10,400); S4 (17,600); P1 (37,000); and P2 (48,600). Over how many hours would S2's cost be allocated?

Case IV: A recently hired staff accountant noted that given the nature of the allocations, the total cost allocated to production departments is typically less under the step-down method than under the direct method. Do you agree with the accountant? Explain?

(a) Answer the questions raised in all four cases above.

(b) Do you think that not allocating the cost appropriately is an ethical issue for accountants? Explains?