Consider the following questions
1) Assume Inez's career with with her employer lasted twenty-seven years, during which time she never specialized in any particular field. She didn't rise very far in the business, only becoming a low-level supervisor, but she did receive regular raises. Her employer terminated her employment without just cause when Inez was age 61 and, due to an economic slowdown, the demand for on-site construction workers reduced dramatically.
a) How much notice would Inez be entitled to under the Employment Standards Code?
b) Assume Inez's employment contract does not exclude common law notice. Which factors arelikely to indicate more or less common law notice?
(a) An abuse cure is a legal right accessible to mistreated investors. It enables the investors to get an activity against the organization which they own offers when the direct of the organization has an impact that is harsh, unreasonably biased, or unjustifiably dismisses the interests of an investor. It was acquainted accordingly with, which had held that where an organization's activities were approved by a dominant part of the investors, the courts won't by and large meddle. Organization law truly depends on the guideline of greater part rule. Board and investor choices of organizations are generally controlled by a straightforward greater part vote. While this idea of lion's share rule is essential to organization law, it contains an innate danger of misuse. This danger was exacerbated by the standard in Foss v Harbottle. As per Brockett this standard gave 'that wrongs to the organization should be changed simply by activity taken by the organization in its own name, rather than the activity of individual individuals or gatherings of individuals, and that 'courts ought not meddle with the inside administration of organizations acting inside their forces.' However, unbending adherence to the standard regularly denied minority investors response against chiefs and dominant part investors. Therefore, the courts built up various 'special cases. In any case, various pundits have contended that the 'exemptions' for the standard in Foss v Harbottle are actually not special cases by any means, but rather circumstances where the standard basically can't apply. In expansion, various commonsense and legitimate challenges concerning the activity of the special cases have implied that moderately hardly any subsidiary activities have continued.' The principle troubles fixated on the impact of confirmation of the purportedly severe lead by the regular gathering of investors. On the off chance that compelling, the implied approval could deny the organization all in all, and henceforth minority investors, any privilege of activity against the chiefs. There were likewise issues brought about by the exacting models that should be set up under the steady gaze of a court may give relief. (b) Any agreement or other exchange implying to be gone into by an organization preceding its arrangement or by any individual for the organization before its development, might be sanctioned by the com-pany after its arrangement; and immediately the organization will get limited by and qualified for the advantage.The DNS system amounts to: O a single physical database composed of multiple logical databases 0 a single logical database composed of a single physical database 0 multiple logical databases composed of a single physical database 0 a single logical database composed of multiple physical databases Question 30 (1 point) Dakota Manufacturing has a contract with Big Box Stores to furnish 10,000 widgets no later than April 15. It takes 14 days to make the widgets. When Dakota's widget 12 of 13 stamping machine breaks on March 20, it orders a new one from Widget Equipment, Inc. (WED) at a cost of $5500. Dakota tells WEI that it must have the new machine by April 1 or it will lose $10,000 for failure to perform its contract with Big Box. WEI does not deliver the widget stamping machine until April 5 and Dakota is unable to fulfill its contract with Big Box. Dakota can recover from WEI: O $5500 in compensatory damages. O $10,000 in consequential damages. O both A and B. 0 50. Save9% (10 marks) Answer the following: a. MPC = .?.What is the government spending multiplier? h. MPC = .85.What is the tax multiplier? c. If the government spending multiplier is 5, what is the tax multiplier? d. If the tax multiplier is -3, what is the government spending multiplier? e. If government purchases and taxes are increased by $150 billion simultaneously, what will the effect he on equilibrium output (income)? The table below shows a small database whose records correspond to courses offered in a university. Course Number Course Title Instructor Quarter CS 111 Digital Image Processing Gupta Spring CS 112 Computer Graphics Gupta Spring CS 117 Project in Computer Vision Hawkins Fall CS 116 Intro to Computer Vision Hawkins Winter CS 122A Intro to Database Management Spencer Spring CS 122A Intro to Database Management Wang Winter CS 122C Principles of Database Management Spencer Winter (a) Give a key for this database
