Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Consider the following two earnings forecasting models: Model 1 (Random walk model) E t (EPS t+1 ) = EPS t Model 2 (Mean-reverting model) E

Consider the following two earnings forecasting models:

Model 1 (Random walk model)        Et(EPSt+1) = EPS t

Model 2 (Mean-reverting model)     Et(EPSt+1) =

Et(EPSt+1) is the EPS forecast for year t+1, given information available at t.

The EPS for TJX for the fiscal years ending January 2006 (FY2005) through January 2010 (FY2009) are:

Fiscal Year

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

EPS

$1.40

$1.60

$1.70

$2.00

$2.80

Part a): What would be the EPS forecast in FY2010 for each model?

  • Model 1 (random walk model):
  • Model 2 (mean-reverting model):           

Part b): Actual EPS for TJX in FY2010 were $3.30. Given this information:

What would be the FY2011 forecast for earnings per share for each model?

Why do the two models generate quite different forecasts?

Which model (random walk or mean-reverting) do you think better describes TJX’s earnings per share patterns? Explain.

Step by Step Solution

3.50 Rating (150 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Business Analysis Valuation Using Financial Statements

Authors: Paul M. Healy

5th edition

1111972303, 978-1111972301

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

What was the positive value of Max Weber's model of "bureaucracy?"

Answered: 1 week ago