Question
Consider the Supreme Court's comments in Miller (No 2) about the separation of powers and politically contentious cases at paras [31], [34] & [39]-[40]. Then
Consider the Supreme Court's comments in Miller (No 2) about the separation of powers and politically contentious cases at paras [31], [34] & [39]-[40]. Then read Nicol's blog on the case.
[In Miller (No 2)] the Supreme Court acted in a partisan fashion as if it were the legal wing of Remain,and as a result the judiciary now needs to have its wings clipped.'Danny Nicol, 'Supreme Court Against the People', (reference above)
Where do the Supreme Court's and Nicol's respective comments each fall in the ongoing 'legalconstitutionalism' versus 'political constitutionalism' debate? Do you find Nicol's criticisms of Miller(No 2) persuasive? Provide reasons for your answer
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started