CONTEXT:

Study 2 tells the story of Wendell Johnson, or more specifically, Mary Tudor's study of children in an orphanage in Iowa. It's called the Monster Study for a reason as you will see.

Associated Press. (2003, August 6). 'Monster Study' still stings.CBS. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/monster-study-still-stings/

**Use this study/article to answer questions below

QUESTIONS:

a. Relying on the week's learning resources (APA Ethics and Code of Conduct), develop an analysis to present as your main post to this discussion form.

b. Give background information and explain which of the General Principles and/or which of the Ethical Standards was violated in the study. Explain how you came to this conclusion, sharing why you believe it was violated.

c. Do you think that the study you chose would be approved by an IRB today? Why do you think the study was allowed, or tolerated, at the time?

Please include APA references.