Continuation of article 1 This argument isn't exactly airtight. If some random social-media account suggests retaliation against the jurors, could Mr. Trump innocently quote it under the terms of the judge's order? Well, no, and the idea that nonpolitical New Yorkers might be worried about serving on this particular jury, even if protected by a gag order, is not a hypothetical. On Thursday one of the women previously selected had second thoughts and was excused. The jury is anonymous, but Juror No. 2 was described in the press as an oncology nurse at Memorial Sloan Kettering, who lives on the Upper East Side with her fianc and likes taking her dog to the park. She said family, friends and colleagues identified her from such details and began blowing up her phone. Judge Merchan told the press to be more circumspect in describing jurors, including by withholding their physical appearances and the names of their employers. Despite those precautions, the identities of the final Trump jury will get out. But some citizens must always be asked to bear the duties of liberty to ensure that the criminally accused receive the right to a jury trial, as the Constitution guarantees. That said, what's the point of using a judicial gag order to shield the likes of Michael Cohen? Mr. Trump's former fixer is expected to be a key witness in the hush-money trial, but lately he has been busy playing pundit. "Every time Donald opens his mouth, you know that something nontruthful is coming out," M