Contrasting leadership styles are most interesting to manage when it's a partner in an organization who manages things differently than you do. It takes a great deal of effort not to jump into meetings and "suggest" how things could be done. But, if you take a moment and look at the bigger picture, there's a very good chance you'll realize that your partner's team actually responds very well to the way they lead. This could be because of the relationship they've established over a period of time or because they don't come with preconceived notions that "they're right." Either way, more often than not, teams are more open leadership styles as compared to a leader's colleagues.

I cannot for the life of me understand what the last sentence means. Can you please explain what the author means by "Either way, more often than not, teams are more open leadership styles as compared to a leader's colleagues."

Thank you