Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Coolies (Pty) Limited which manufactures cool drinks purchased Competitor (Pty) Ltd, a competitor company (also a manufacturer of cool drinks) which had an assessed loss

Coolies (Pty) Limited which manufactures cool drinks purchased Competitor (Pty) Ltd, a

competitor company (also a manufacturer of cool drinks) which had an assessed loss of R20 million. Within two weeks of purchasing the shares of Competitor, the marketing director of Coolies informed the board of directors that Coolies would not have sufficient

manufacturing capacity to supply the market with the demand for Coolies production

expected at Christmas.

At the meeting, the board of directors decided that the excess manufacturing capacity of

Competitor would be used to manufacture Coolies products.

The financial director of Coolies who had recently completed the Advanced Programme

in Taxation at Unisa recommended the following to the board:

a) Coolies would enter into an agreement with Competitor whereby Competitor

would be appointed an authorised manufacturer of Coolies products.

b) Competitor would also be appointed the sole distributor of Coolies products

(including other products manufactured by Coolies).

c) The profit accruing to the company over the next twelve months as a result of (a)

above is estimated to amount to R12 million whilst the profit accruing as a result

of (b) above would be in the region of R8 million.

50

d) The effect of the agreements would be that the Coolies Group would be able to

reduce the tax payable in the next financial year by some R5,6 million.

e) When the assessed loss had been utilised in full the manufacturing and sole

distributorship rights of Competitor would be cancelled and the business of

Competitor would then become a division of Coolies.

The board agreed to the financial director's proposal and the proposal was

implemented.

In the year after Competitor became a division of Coolies, the Commissioner attacked

the scheme under section 103(2).

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO:

Discuss the nature and extent of the defences, if any, that Competitor and Coolies could

invoke in objecting to an assessment in which the Commissioner applies the provisions

of section 103(2) of the Income Tax Act to the transactions.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Mergers, Acquisitions, And Corporate Restructurings

Authors: Patrick A Gaughan

7th Edition

1119380766, 9781119380764

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

please answer in detail poop

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The quality of the argumentation

Answered: 1 week ago