Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Cost-benefit analyses typically reflect utilitarian thinking, but too often they are slanted toward what is good for those in positions of power (e.g. union leaders,

image text in transcribed
Cost-benefit analyses typically reflect utilitarian thinking, but too often they are slanted toward what is good for those in positions of power (e.g. union leaders, corporations, politicians), rather than the good for everyone affected, as utilitarians require. A cost-benefit analysis identifies the good and bad consequences of some action or policy, usually in terms of dollars. It weighs the total positives against the total negatives, and then compares the results to similar tallies of the consequences of alternative actions or rules. In the following case, was Ford justified in relying exclusively on a cost-benefit analysis, or were there additional moral considerations that they should have used in deciding whether to improve the safety of the Pinto? What might rights ethicists and duty ethicists, as well as rule- utilitarians, say about the case? For years, the Pinto was the largest-selling subcompact car in America. During the early stages of its development, crash- worthiness tests revealed that the Pinto could not sustain a front- end collision without the windshield breaking. A quick-fix solution was adopted: The drive train was moved backward. As a result, the differential was moved very close to the gas tank. Thus many gas tanks collapsed and exploded on rear-end collisions at low speeds. In 1977, Mark Dowie published an article in Mother Jones magazine that divulged the cost-benefit analysis developed by Ford Motor Company in 1971 to decide whether to add an $11 part per car that would greatly reduce injuries by protecting the vulnerable fuel tank-a tank that exploded in rear-end collisions under 5 miles per hour.12 The $11 seems an insignificant expense, even adjusting to current dollars, but in fact it would make it far more difficult to market a car that was to be sold for no more than $2,000. Moreover, the costs of installing the part on 11 million cars and another 1.5 million light trucks added up. The cost of not installing the part and instead paying out costs for death and injuries from accidents was projected using a cost- benefit analysis. The analysis estimated the worth of a human life at about $200,000, a figure borrowed from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The cost per non-death injury was $67,000. These figures were arrived at by adding together such costs as a typical worker's future earnings, hospital and mortuary costs, and legal fees. In addition, it was estimated that approximately 180 burn deaths and another 180 serious burn injuries would occur each year. Multiplying these numbers together, the annual costs for death and injury was $49.5 million, far less than the estimated $137 million for adding the part, let alone the lost revenue from trying to advertise a car for the uninviting figure of $2,011, or else reducing profit margins

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

How To Audit The Process Based QMS

Authors: Arter, Dennis R., Cianfrani, Charles A, And West, John E., 'Jack'

2nd Edition

0873898443, 978-0873898447

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

What additional evidence would help evaluate the alternatives?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Different types of Grading?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Explain the functions of financial management.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

HOW MANY TOTAL WORLD WAR?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Discuss the scope of financial management.

Answered: 1 week ago