Could a defendant be found responsible under a theory of strict liability if defendant's parrot takes anip of the plaintiff? A) no, because parrots are not wild animals

B) yes, if that particular bird has bit someone before

C) no, because those kinds of birds are non-violent

D) yes, since birds are wild animals

A jurisdiction has enacted a dog-bite liability statute. The defendant's dog has never bitten anyoneuntil it bites plaintiff. Will plaintiff's claim for damages under a theory of strict liability succeed? A) no, because strict liability applies only to wild animals

B) yes, because of the statute

C) no, because the dog had no known propensity for violence

D) yes, because a duty of care is imposed as a matter of common law