could you help me, I can't find the case you usedonCanlii for this answer?( 2 cases)

Administrative Oversight:

Case 1: In the case of City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., the Supreme Court held that a city ordinance requiring gun stores to obtain a special license in order to operate within its borders was a valid exercise of the city's police power to protect the public health and safety. The Court held that the city's oversight was reasonable, and that the ordinance did not infringe upon the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Case 2: In the case of Gonzales v. Oregon, the Supreme Court held that the Controlled Substances Act did not provide the federal government with the authority to override a state law that allowed physicians to prescribe controlled substances to terminally ill patients. The Court found that the federal government's oversight of the state law was unreasonable, and that it deprived the state of its authority to regulate the practice of medicine within its borders.

Procedural Fairness:

Case 1: In the case of Goldberg v. Kelly, the Supreme Court held that due process requires that a person receiving welfare benefits must be given a hearing before their benefits can be terminated. The Court held that welfare recipients must be given an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence to support their claim for benefits before their benefits can be terminated.

Case 2: In the case of Mathews v. Eldridge, the Supreme Court held that due process requires that a person receiving Social Security disability benefits must be given a hearing before their benefits can be terminated. The Court held that the Social Security Administration must provide the beneficiary with an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence to support their claim for benefits before their benefits can be terminated.