Could you please explain how to interpret data variance based upon the below Rotated Component Matrix Table (analyzed via Factor Analysis in SPSS)?

The items (questions) are from a survey are in the first column on the left of the below Rotated Component Matrix Table.

For example, in the Rotated Component Matrix Table - The first factor accounted for what percentage of the variance; the second factor accounted for what percentage of the variance; the third factor accounted for what percentage of the variance? Thanks so much.

ITEMS (Indicator Variables)	FACTOR 1	FACTOR 2	FACTOR 3
13. The World Bank effectively met lending demands of emerging markets by increasing the capital in IFC during 2008-2016.	.906
14. The World Bank effectively met lending demands of emerging markets by increasing the capital in MIGA during 2008-2016.	.891
12. The World Bank effectively met lending demands of emerging markets by increasing the capital in IDA during 2008-2016.	.860
11. The World Bank effectively met lending demands of emerging markets by increasing the capital in IBRD during 2008-2016.	.806
10. The World Bank’s demand for policy reform as a condition of loan approval had a positive impact upon its lending to emerging markets in 2008-2016.	.699
7. The World Bank provided unsustainable aid to many host governments during the period 2008-2016.		.813
16. The World Bank’s Rapid Response Policy consistently delivered effective loan assistance to countries emerging from conflicts during 2008-2016.		.805
5.After the financial crisis in 2008, the World Bank created an economic faux pas by not properly forecasting debt to GDP resulting in constrained lending to emerging markets and lower capital availability.		.643
6. The World Bank should have provided host governments with Advanced Advisory and Analytical advice to facilitate future drivers of growth during 2008-2016.		.593
15. The World Bank effectively measured compliance with loan conditions in emerging markets by streamlining its Project Development Objectives (PDOs) during 2008-2016.		.555
8. The World Bank subsidized ineffective borrowing by host governments in emerging markets during the period 2008-2016.			.755
9. The World Bank missed opportunities to foster sustainable economic growth when it made large loans to powerful countries in the period 2008 to 2016.			.687
17. By lending to countries graduated from projects, the World Bank missed an opportunity to shift lending to more promising projects in emerging market countries during 2008-2016.			.658